E. How many feet are there in 14.0 yards? (3 ft = 1 yd)

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

What term best describes a line ans a point that lie in the same plane

The frequency table shows a set of data collected by a doctor for adult patients who were diagnosed with a strain of influenza. patients with influenza age range number of sick patients 25 to 29 30 to 34 35 to 39 40 to 45 which dot plot could represent the same data as the frequency table? patients with flu