4. Which fraction is closest to 1?
b)
a)
IN
л м
3
c)...
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04, Uc34758
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:30, Kayccee9958
Anyone know? is appreciated! will mark brainliest if correct!
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30, FailingstudentXD
Do some research and find a city that has experienced population growth. determine its population on january 1st of a certain year. write an exponential function to represent the city’s population, y, based on the number of years that pass, x after a period of exponential growth. describe the variables and numbers that you used in your equation.
Answers: 3
Mathematics, 07.05.2020 02:14
Chemistry, 07.05.2020 02:14
History, 07.05.2020 02:14
English, 07.05.2020 02:14