Brainliest for correct answer

Hey there!

The error in this congruence statement is that we don't know if these are actually congruent.

Saying that the triangles "look the same" simply isn't enough. We do know that all three angles are the same, but the AAA (Angle Angle Angle) postulate only works for similar triangles.

Additionally, even if they were congruent, it would still be triangle ABC ≅ triangle FED, not triangle DEF.

Let me know if this helps :)

The wrote the order wrong so they are not congruent until you fix their mistake

Step-by-step explanation:

ABC~ FDE

the discriminant is 64 + 4*1*12 = 112

this is prime.

step-by-step explanation:

this is the formula: v = the value of investment at the end of the time period

p = the principal amount (the initial amount invested)

r = the annual interest rate

n = the annual frequency of compounding (how many times a year interest is added)

t = the number of years the money is invested

^ means raise to the power of