Mathematics
Mathematics, 31.08.2020 09:01, vgann3020

Jacki evaluated the expression below. 2 cubed (3 minus 1) + 4 (8 minus 12) = 2 cubed (2) + 4 (4) = 8 (2) + 16 = 16 + 16 = 32. What was Jacki’s error? Jacki should have simplified the exponent first. Jacki should have multiplied 4 and 8 first. Jacki did not subtract 12 from 8 correctly. Jacki should not have multiplied

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:30, S28073161
Which of the following represents the factorization of the trinomial below? x^2+7x-30
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:50, 7obadiah
He graph of f(x) = |x| is stretched by a factor of 0.3 and translated down 4 units. which statement about the domain and range of each function is correct? the range of the transformed function and the parent function are both all real numbers greater than or equal to 4. the domain of the transformed function is all real numbers and is, therefore, different from that of the parent function. the range of the transformed function is all real numbers greater than or equal to 0 and is, therefore, different from that of the parent function. the domain of the transformed function and the parent function are both all real numbers.
Answers: 3
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:20, ale1910
Using only the digits 5, 6, 7, 8, how many different three digit numbers can be formed if no digit is repeated in a number?
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:20, kaybec2386
Data for the height of a model rocket launch in the air over time are shown in the table. darryl predicted that the height of the rocket at 8 seconds would be about 93 meters. did darryl make a good prediction? yes, the data are best modeled by a quadratic function. the value of the function at 8 seconds is about 93 meters. yes, the data are best modeled by a linear function. the first differences are constant, so about 93 meters at 8 seconds is reasonable. no, the data are exponential. a better prediction is 150 meters. no, the data are best modeled by a cubic function. a better prediction is 100 meters.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Jacki evaluated the expression below. 2 cubed (3 minus 1) + 4 (8 minus 12) = 2 cubed (2) + 4 (4) = 8...

Questions in other subjects: