Mathematics, 20.08.2020 16:01, naiomireyes74p2aybs
Ramesh says that based on the pattern 7 Superscript negative 5 = negative 16,807. Which statement explains whether Ramesh is correct? Ramesh is correct because 7 Superscript negative 5 is equivalent to Negative 7 times (negative 7) times (negative 7) times (negative 7) times (negative 7), which has the same value as Negative 16,807. Ramesh is correct because as the exponents decrease, the previous value is divided by 7, so 7 Superscript negative 5 = 1 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 = negative 16,807. Ramesh is not correct because 7 Superscript negative 5 is equivalent to StartFraction 1 Over 7 Superscript 5 EndFraction, which has the same value as StartFraction 1 Over 7 Superscript 4 EndFraction divided by 7 = StartFraction 1 Over 7 cubed EndFraction = StartFraction 1 Over 343 EndFraction. Ramesh is not correct because as the exponents decrease, the previous value is divided by 7, so 7 Superscript negative 5 = 1 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 = StartFraction 1 Over 16,807 EndFraction.
Answers: 3
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:20, jonestmoney381
Jimmy can run 3.5 miles in 20 minutes. how far can ne run in one hour and ten minutes?
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:00, jnsoccerboy7260
The perimeter of a rectangular rug is 24 feet. the length of the rug is 1 2/5 i s width. what is the area of the rug
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:30, kadinmorgan
The value, v, of kalani’s stock investments over a time period, x, can be determined using the equation v=750(0.80)^-x. what is the rate of increase or decrease associated with this account? 20% decrease 20% increase 25% decrease 25% increase
Answers: 1
Ramesh says that based on the pattern 7 Superscript negative 5 = negative 16,807. Which statement ex...
History, 16.04.2021 20:00
Physics, 16.04.2021 20:00
Geography, 16.04.2021 20:00
English, 16.04.2021 20:00