7²-3+9x8÷2 evaluate Please, urgent

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Given: hf || jk; hg ? jg prove: fhg ? kjg to prove that the triangles are congruent by asa, which statement and reason could be used as part of the proof? fgh ? kgj because vertical angles are congruent. jkg ? hfg because vertical angles are congruent. fhg ? jkg because right angles are congruent. hfg ? kjg because alternate interior angles are congruent.

What is the equation in slope-intercept form of the linear function represented by the table? y -18 -1 -8 4 2 912 o y=-2x-6 o y=-2x+6 o y=2x-6 o y = 2x+6