Which of the following explains how ΔAEB could be proven similar to ΔDEC using the AA similarity postulate? A) ∠AEB ≅ ∠CED because vertical angles are congruent; reflect ΔCED across segment FG, then translate point D to point A to confirm ∠EAB ≅ ∠EDC. B)∠AEB ≅ ∠CED because vertical angles are congruent; rotate ΔCED 180° around point E, then dilate ΔCED to confirm segment EB ≅ segment EC. C) ∠AEB ≅ ∠DEC because vertical angles are congruent; rotate ΔCED 180° around point E, then translate point D to point A to confirm ∠EAB ≅ ∠EDC. D) ∠AEB ≅ ∠DEC because vertical angles are congruent; reflect ΔCED across segment FG, then dilate ΔCED to confirm segment EB ≅ segment ED

C

Step-by-step explanation:

We can eliminate B and D because the AA postulate includes 2 corresponding congruent pairs of angles, not sides. A does not make sense because you can't reflect ΔCED across FG and then translate point D to A, you need to rotate it 180°. Therefore, the answer is C.

c - they will have the same distribution

step-by-step explanation:

this is the only one that could make sense. : )

in mathematics, a constraint is a condition of an optimization problem that the solution must satisfy. there are several types of constraints—primarily equality constraints, inequality constraints, and integer constraints. the set of candidate solutions that satisfy all constraints is called the feasible set.

hoped i'm right lol