Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:00, tynitenaire
Idon’t understand this.. will someone ? will mark brainliest along with 20 points.
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:40, rivera8
Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:30, cramirezorozco392
Whit h equation best represents this situation the number 98 increased by an unknown number equal to 120
Answers: 1
Could you solve this inequality, please?
x⁴ + 3x - 2 ≥ 0...
x⁴ + 3x - 2 ≥ 0...