A researcher wishes to see if the average number of sick days a worker takes per year is less than 5. A random sample of 30 workers at a large department store had a mean of 4.8. The standard deviation of the population is 1.2 days. Is there enough evidence to support the claim at alpha = 0.01?

No. At a significance level of 0.01, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the average number of sick days a worker takes per year is significantly less than 5.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the population mean.

The claim is that the average number of sick days a worker takes per year is significantly less than 5.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

The significance level is 0.01.

The sample has a size n=30.

The sample mean is M=4.8.

The standard deviation of the population is known and has a value of σ=1.2.

We can calculate the standard error as:

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

This test is a left-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as:

As the P-value (0.181) is bigger than the significance level (0.01), the effect is not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

At a significance level of 0.01, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the average number of sick days a worker takes per year is significantly less than 5.

1 is c

2 is a

3 is a

step-by-step explanation:

black/brown

step-by-step explanation:

well, you see here, jamal was born to 2 parents, his mother who he lives with and his father who left at a young age and who happens to be younger than him. he stole cookies because he has to steal food due to the fact that he spends his government poverty checks on pot and women.