Mathematics, 13.07.2020 16:01, pino40
Jeremy is trying to explain why a triangle with side lengths 35, 30, 60 is not a right triangle. His explanation is shown below. Step 1: 35 squared + 30 squared question mark equals 60 squared Step 2: (35 + 30) squared question mark equals 60 squared Step 3: 65 squared question mark equals 60 squared Step 4: 4,225 not-equals 3,600 Which best describes Jeremy's explanation? Jeremy's explanation is accurate. Jeremy's explanation is inaccurate. He wrote the leg lengths in the incorrect order in step 1. Jeremy's explanation is inaccurate. He incorrectly combined terms in step 2. Jeremy's explanation is inaccurate. He multiplied incorrectly in step 4.
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00, naimareiad
Ialready asked this but i never got an answer. will give a high rating and perhaps brainliest. choose the linear inequality that describes the graph. the gray area represents the shaded region. y β€ β4x β 2 y > β4x β 2 y β₯ β4x β 2 y < 4x β 2
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:00, noahdwilke
36x2 + 49y2 = 1,764 the foci are located at: (-β13, 0) and (β13,0) (0, -β13) and (0,β13) (-1, 0) and (1, 0)edit: the answer is (- the square root of 13, 0) and (the square root of 13, 0)
Answers: 1
Jeremy is trying to explain why a triangle with side lengths 35, 30, 60 is not a right triangle. His...
Mathematics, 08.07.2019 22:30
Mathematics, 08.07.2019 22:30
English, 08.07.2019 22:30
Mathematics, 08.07.2019 22:30
Physics, 08.07.2019 22:30