URGENT AT LEAST TAKE A LOOK 13. Assume that you have a square. What can you conclude from applying the law of detachment to this conditional?

If you have a square, then you have a rectangle.

A) You have a quadrilateral.
B) All sides are the same length.
C) Squares and rectangles are the same.
D) You have a rectangle.

14. Which two theorems would justify that m∠4 = m∠6, given that m∠5 = m∠6 in the diagram below?
IMAGE BELOW
A) vertical angles theorem, consecutive interior angles theorem
B) vertical angles theorem, alternate interior angles theorem
C) right angles theorem, exterior angles theorem
D) corresponding angles theorem, angle addition theorem

d: please note I am not sure about this but look at my reasoning and maybe you can find your own answer that you are sure about.

D: i am sure about this.

Step-by-step explanation:

From what I looked up, i believe what you are talking about is deductive reasoning, which is based off of facts. It can't be a or b because that wasn't defined in the statement. Squares and rectangles are not the same thing since you can have a square that is a rectangle, but a rectangle that is not a square, so D is correct.

corresponding angles i believe since they are matching

I know that the 2 lines are parallel because 5 and 6 are alternate interior angles since they are on opposite sides.

4 and 6 are not vertical or right angles, so it must be d, also they follow what a corresponding angle is, which is them being matching.

.there can be infinite values of m and n that can satisfy the above equation. for each value of m of m or n. there maybe infinite sets of solution for the above

step-by-step explanation: