One day Pat Unger worked for a total of 8 hours. She worked 3 hours more in the after-
noon than she worked in the morning. How
long did she work in the afternoon?

5.5 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the no. of hours worked in morning by Pat = x hours

given that "She worked 3 hours more in the after-

noon than she worked in the morning"

No. of hours worked in Afternoon by Pat = x + 3  hours

Total hours worked in the day = x + x+3 = 2x +3 hours  (1)

It is given that Pat worked for 8 hours that day (2)

thus, using 1 and 2 we have

2x +3  =  8

=>2x = 8 - 3 = 5

=> x = 5/2 = 2.5

no. of hours worked in morning by Pat = x hours = 2.5 hours

No. of hours worked in Afternoon by Pat = x + 3  hours = 2.5 + 3 hours

 No. of hours worked in Afternoon by Pat = 5.5 hours --- Answer.

statement #3: proof- ang is congruent to ang ecd : angles are congruent.  

step-by-step explanation:

1: the missing angles in statement #3  

a.) acb  

reason- the reason why the answer is acb is because angle ecd and angle acb are both the same size *that's what the word congruent means this is really simple.  

2: the missing word in reason #3  

c.) vertical  

reason- the reason why the answer is vertical is because the angles in that diagram on figure 2 is slanted, which is vertical, and the e and a both lay on vertical lines. along with the other's, but e and a are the 2 main points you want to focus on. and c is kind of like your starting point, because c is for both angles, not just one.  

i hope that was and understanding.