Part 1: Based on your knowledge of fair decision making and probability concepts, should the Power Pill be produced and distributed? Explain your reasoning. Part 2: What effect (if any) did telling two groups about expected outcomes have on results? Use statistics to provide proof for your reasoning and explain. Part 3: Are there any flaws in the testing process? Should any of the steps or protocol be changed/avoided during round two of testing? Explain your reasoning.

the inequality is:

250c+180g≥950

step-by-step explanation:

let c denotes the number of days in a week   miyoko worked as a cryptographer.

and g denotes the number of days in a week she works as a geologist.

now we are given that she earns $250 for every day she works as a cryptographer,and earns $180 for every day she works as a geologist.

now miyoko's goal is to earn more than $950 this week.

hence, the inequality could be represented as:

250c+180g≥950

step-by-step explanation:

to find if any function is an inverse of the other, put the first equation in as x in the next one. then simplify and solve. if at the end you get the statement y = x, then it is an inverse. if you get anything else, it is not.

the opening of this porabola is facing up

step-by-step explanation:

it's 100

step-by-step explanation:

22, 28, 34, 40, 46

b)   f(n) = 6n + 16

  n = what is the number of the row ( 22 would be row 1) so if we replaced n with 1, we would get 22

c)   the  14th  row will have 100 seats

(1)   (2)   (3)   (4)   (5)   (6)   (7)   (8)   (9)   (10) (11) (12) (13) (14)

22 | 28 | 34 | 40 | 46 | 52 | 58 | 64 | 70 | 76 | 82 | 88 | 94 | 100

read more on -