Ryan is trying to determine whether 2.7x-5.9 is equivalent to 2.8x-5.9. To test this, he substitutes 0 for X into both expressions. Explain why this will not give him the correct answer

The coefficients of x are different in the expressions, but the constant values are the same. Zero times any value is zero, so both expressions will be equal to –5.9. If Ryan tried any other number, he would see that the expressions are not equivalent.

read explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

This won't give him the correct answer because if he substitutes zero into anything he will get -5.9. 0 multiplied by anything is 0 and if you put that into bot equations you get the same answer so it won't help him. he should instead try 1 or something like that.

required rate of return = 0.166 = 16.6%

step-by-step explanation:

under the capital asset pricing model (capm), the required or expected rate of return for a particular security or asset is given using the formula:

required rate of return = risk-free rate + beta*(market risk premium)

we are given that;

risk-free rate = 4% = 0.04

beta = 1.4

market risk premium = 9% = 0.09

we simply plug these values into the above formula;

required rate of return = 0.04 + 1.4*(0.09)

required rate of return = 0.04 + 0.126

required rate of return = 0.166 = 16.6%

a

step-by-step explanation: