Faced with rising fax costs, a firm issued a guideline that transmissions of 10 pages or more should be sent by 2-day mail instead. Exceptions are allowed, but they want the average to be 10 or below. The firm examined 35 randomly chosen fax transmissions during the next year, yielding a sample mean of 14.44 with a standard deviation of 4.45 pages. (a-1) Find the test statistic. (Round your answer to 4 decimal places.) The test statistic (a-2) At the .01 level of significance, is the true mean greater than 10

Step-by-step explanation:

We would set up the hypothesis test. This is a test of a single population mean since we are dealing with mean

For the null hypothesis,

µ ≤ 10

For the alternative hypothesis,

µ > 10

The inequality sign indicates that It is a right tailed.

Since the population standard deviation is not given, the distribution is a student's t.

Since n = 35,

Degrees of freedom, df = n - 1 = 35 - 1 = 34

t = (x - µ)/(s/√n)

Where

x = sample mean = 14.44

µ = population mean = 10

s = samples standard deviation = 4.45

t = (14.44 - 10)/(4.45/√35) = 5.9

We would determine the p value using the t test calculator. It becomes

p < 0.00001

Since alpha, 0.01 > than the p value, then we would reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, At a 1% level of significance, we can conclude that the true mean is greater than 10.

the results from a pre-test for students for the year 2000 and the year 2010 are illustrated in the box plot. what do these results tell us about how students performed on the 29 question pre-test for the two years?

if we compare only the lowest and highest scores between the two years, we might conclude that the students in 2010 did better than the students in 2010. this conclusion seems to follow since the lowest score of 8 in 2010 is greater in value than the lowest score of 6 in 2000. also, the highest score of 28 in 2010 is greater in value than the highest score of 27 in 2000.

but the box portion of the illustration gives us more detailed information. the middle bar in each box shows us that the median score of 20 in 2000 is greater in value than the median score of 17 in 2010. further, we note that the box and whiskers divide the illustration into four pieces. each of these four pieces represents the same portion of students. so, the upper half of the students in 2000 scored in the same score range as the upper one-fourth of the students in 2010, see the illustration at a score of 20.

by considering the upper one-fourth, upper half, and upper three-fourths instead of just the lowest and highest scores, we would conclude that the students as a whole did much better in 2000 than in 2010. we would conclude that as a whole the students in 2010 are less prepared than the students in 2000.

in this section, we discuss box-and-whisker plots and the five key values used in constructing a box-and-whisker plot. the key values are called a five-number summary, which consists of the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

step-by-step explanation: