Answers: 2
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04, Uc34758
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:20, lambobacon9027
Classify the following triangle check all that apply
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:40, stephen4438
Which of the following represents the range of the graph of f(x) below
Answers: 1
Which of the following is a rational number?...
Mathematics, 18.11.2020 06:30
Mathematics, 18.11.2020 06:30
Mathematics, 18.11.2020 06:30
Biology, 18.11.2020 06:30
Chemistry, 18.11.2020 06:30