HURRY ANSWER ASAP PLZ WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!
What is the surface area of the triangular prism shown?

32 square centimeters
120 square centimeters
184 square centimeters
1,560 square centimeters

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Given: hf || jk; hg ? jg prove: fhg ? kjg to prove that the triangles are congruent by asa, which statement and reason could be used as part of the proof? fgh ? kgj because vertical angles are congruent. jkg ? hfg because vertical angles are congruent. fhg ? jkg because right angles are congruent. hfg ? kjg because alternate interior angles are congruent.

What is the value of x in the equation 2(x-4) = 4(2x + 1)?