Can ATSR and AQRS be proven congruent by SAS?
yes, because along with the given information on
the diagram, SR = RS by the refexive property
yes, because a reflection will map ATSR onto
AQRS
yes because P appears to be the midpoint of
SQ and TR
no, because not enough is information given to
prove the triangles congruent by SAS
Done

angle uzt is congruent to angle tzy. angle vzw is congruent to angle yzx.

(credits to leowren)

step-by-step explanation:

10/60

step-by-step explanation:

if you divide 10 by 60 the answer is 0.166666 while if you divide or solve the other problems it equals 0.6

answer: on graphs, the open and closed circles, or vertical asymptotes drawn as dashed lines us identify discontinuities.

as before, graphs and tables allow us to estimate at best.

when working with formulas, getting zero in the denominator indicates a point of discontinuity.

when working with piecewise-defined functions, check for discontinuities at the transition points where one piece ends and the next begins.

step-by-step explanation: