Geometry please help micheal and derrick each completed a separate proof to show that corresponding angles AKG and ELK are congruent. who completed the proof incorrectly? explain

Michael completed it incorrectly. At 2, he says Angle AKG = Angle AKL, which isn't true. This messes up the rest of the proof.

step-by-step explanation:

first, eliminate the parenthesis:

3

x

+

2

−

4

x

second, group like terms:

3

x

−

4

x

+

2

third, combine like terms:

(

3

−

4

)

x

+

2

→

−

1

x

+

2

→

−

x

+

2

0.6, 3/5, and 6% are the 3 same portion.

but, when they're all changed to a decimal they would equal to 0.6.

hope this , good luck!