Please Answer! Will give brainliest

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Aregression was run to determine if there is a relationship between hours of tv watched per day (x) and number of situps a person can do (y). the results of the regression were: y=ax+b a=-0.662 b=30.418 r2=0.703921 r=-0.839

Astudent survey asked: "how tall are you (in inches)? " here's the data: 67, 72, 73, 60, 65, 86, 72, 69, 74 give the five number summary. a. median: 73, mean: 70.89, iqr: 5, min: 60, max: 74 b. 60, 66, 72, 73.5, 86 c. 60, 67, 72, 73, 74 d. 0, 60, 70, 89, 74, 100