Ming has a standard
5252
52
52
-card deck. A standard
5252
52
52
-card deck has
44
4
4
suits
(♠(♠
(♠
left parenthesis, ♠
,
♣,♦♣ ,\red♦
♣,♦
♣, comma, start color #df0030, ♦, end color #df0030
, and
♥\red♥
♥
start color #df0030, ♥, end color #df0030
))
)
right parenthesis
and an equal number of cards of each suit. She is going to randomly draw a card from the deck
300300
300
300
times, putting the card back in the deck after each draw.
Complete the following statement with the best prediction.
Ming will draw something other than a
♥\Large\red♥
♥
start color #df0030, ♥, end color #df0030
…

squares, rhombus, rectangles

no oblique asymptote

step-by-step explanation:

to find the oblique asymptote of f(x)

here numerator has degree 1 and denomintor degree 2

degree of numerator < degree of denominator

hence there is no oblique asymptote

when the degree of the denominator > that of the numerator, we saw that the value in the denominator got so much bigger, so quickly,   giving us a horizontal asymptote of the x-axis. or we can write

f(x) = a polynomial of x + a proper fraction.

in this case only we have oblique asymptotes but not when numerator has less degree.

why are you giving so many marks make your marks less and make a question list so that i can understand your question very nicely