Kevin and his friends are at a baseball game. Kevin decides to buy sandwiches and bottled water for his friends. Each sandwich cost $5.29, and each bottle of water to costs $2.68. Kevin spend a total of $50.43 on sandwiches and water for his friends, and he purchases two more sandwiches than bottles of water. Create a system of equations to model the situation above, and use it to determine if the solution of the system is viable.

A) there is not enough information to determine whether the solution of the system is viable.

B) Kevin purchases seven sandwiches and five bottles of water; therefore the solution is viable for the given situation.

C) Kevin cannot purchase a negative number of sandwiches or a negative number of bottles of water; therefore the solution is not viable for the given situation.

D) Kevin cannot purchase a negative number of bottles of water; therefore the solution is not viable for the given situation.

answer: the value of x is 7cm

step-by-step explanation:

i think it's eleven too, don't woosh me here, but according to the "experts" it's 2.

the proof starts from the peano postulates, which define the natural

numbers n. n is the smallest set satisfying these postulates:

  p1.   1 is in n.

  p2.   if x is in n, then its "successor" x' is in n.

  p3.   there is no x such that x' = 1.

  p4.   if x isn't 1, then there is a y in n such that y' = x.

  p5.   if s is a subset of n, 1 is in s, and the implication

      (x in s => x' in s) holds, then s = n.

then you have to define addition recursively:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 1, then define a + b = a'

      (using p1 and p2). if b isn't 1, then let c' = b, with c in n

      (using p4), and define a + b = (a + c)'.

then you have to define 2:

  def:   2 = 1'

2 is in n by p1, p2, and the definition of 2.

theorem:   1 + 1 = 2

proof: use the first part of the definition of + with a = b = 1.

      then 1 + 1 = 1' = 2   q.e.d.

note: there is an alternate formulation of the peano postulates which

replaces 1 with 0 in p1, p3, p4, and p5. then you have to change the

definition of addition to this:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 0, then define a + b = a.

      if b isn't 0, then let c' = b, with c in n, and define

      a + b = (a + c)'.

you also have to define 1 = 0', and 2 = 1'. then the proof of the

theorem above is a little different:

proof: use the second part of the definition of + first:

      1 + 1 = (1 + 0)'

      now use the first part of the definition of + on the sum in

      parentheses:   1 + 1 = (1)' = 1' = 2   q.e.d.

the correct answer option is d. la = πrs.

step-by-step explanation:

we know that for a right cone, the lateral surface area is given by:

lateral area of right cone =

here the value under the square root is equal to slant height so replacing this value by in the formula to get:

lateral area of right cone =

therefore, the correct answer option is d.