Which of these is a valid argument concerning the measures of the corresponding angles of similar triangles?

a.
Similar triangles must have the same shape, so the measures of the corresponding angles must be equal to each other.

b.
Similar triangles do not have to have the same shape, so the measures of the corresponding angles do not have to be equal to each other.

c.
Similar triangles must be the same size, so the measures of the corresponding angles must be equal to each other.

d.
Similar triangles do not have to be the same size, so the measures of the corresponding angles do not have to be equal to each other.

step-by-step explanation:

we can use this expression to calculate the energy gain as a particle moves with a field or the energy loss as it moves against it. (note that it is also used to define the electron-volt, a unit of energy equal to that gained by an electron as it falls through a pd of 1 v, i.e. w = 1 ev = 1.6 10-19 c 1 v = 1.6 10-19j).in fact this expression is really nothing more than the statement that potential is the potential energy per unit charge. in this case, v= w/qis simply stating that the change in potential energy(or work done) per unit charge is equal to the change in potential (or potential difference), v.student questions: uniform electric fields2electron beamcathode+5 kvanode0 v

sinn is the total amount of students now and m were the students before, you subtract them both (n-m) and divide that by m. then, since to get a percentage from a fraction you have to multiply by 100, your answer should look like this: n-m/m*100

step-by-step explanation:

it is 10.6 according to my calculations