Please help! What makes this graph misleading?

Inconsistent scale on the y-axis.

Step-by-step explanation:

While it may seem that the scaling is "consistent", look at the first jump. The scale from 0 to 200 is 200. This means that every single one after should be scaled at +200 (i.e., 0, 200, 400, 600, 800). Also, notice how there is no break in the graph. This misleads the data represented.

~

Option A, inconsistent scale on the y-axis

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1:  Determine what makes the graph misleading

Since the y axis started at 0 and jumped to 200 doesn't make sense.  So, the answer is inconsistent scale on the y-axis.

Option B doesn't work because it does start at 0

Option C doesn't work because all of the bars have the same width

Option D doesn't work because it would be illogical

 Option A, inconsistent scale on the y-axis

i think it would be 43 movies that would have to be watched.

step-by-step explanation:

think about it. for the second plan, every month is 8 dollars. 8 x 12= 96. so thats the number for the second plan. now for the first plan, its annual meaning you have to pay 10 dollars every year. so now you have to get an equivalent amount of 86 since 96-10=86. 86 divided by 2 since every movie costs 2$ then you would have to watch 43 movies a year to get the same as the second plan. i really hoped this . have a wonderful day as well!

21

step-by-step explanation: