Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid.
Loretta's hobby is stamp collecting. If her husband likes to fish, then Loretta's hobby is not stamp collecting. If her husband does not like to fish, then Nathan likes to read. Therefore, Nathan likes to read.

Invalid arguement

Step-by-step explanation:

You can't say Loretta's hobby isn't stamp collecting if her husband likes to fish. It is illogical. Same deal with Nathan liking to read. Illogical.

The argument is valid.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are told "Loretta's hobby is stamp collecting."

"If her husband likes to fish, then Loretta's hobby is not stamp collecting."

Her hobby is stamp collecting, so her husband does not like to fish.

"If her husband does not like to fish, then Nathan likes to read."

Her husband does not like to fish; therefore, Nathan likes to read.

The argument is valid.

-362

step-by-step explanation:

(12)(4)+2(12)-34(12)+2(12)-3

  \/         \/         \/         \/

  48 +   24 -   408 + 24 - 3

      \   /               \   /

          72     -     432 - 3 = -363

no association

step-by-step explanation:

if you have eyes and you can use them efficiently you can see that it just looks like random dots like do a line of best fit and like they're so spread out it's such a weak association you might as well consider it nonexistent