Which statement best demonstrates why the following is a non-example of a polynomial?
the quantity 33 over 16 minus the quantity 62 times y squared times x times y minus the quantity 35 times z to the power of 1 over 3 times y squared
A. The expression has a variable raised to a negative exponent.
B. The expression has a variable in the denominator of a fraction.
C. The expression has a negative coefficient.
D. The expression has a variable raised to a fraction.

the first one is x^2+2x+2

the second one is x^2+4

the last one is x^2-4x+8

"exterior angles = 360 / number of sides.

60 = 360 / sides

sides = 360 / 60

sides = 6"

statement #3: proof- ang is congruent to ang ecd : angles are congruent.  

step-by-step explanation:

1: the missing angles in statement #3  

a.) acb  

reason- the reason why the answer is acb is because angle ecd and angle acb are both the same size *that's what the word congruent means this is really simple.  

2: the missing word in reason #3  

c.) vertical  

reason- the reason why the answer is vertical is because the angles in that diagram on figure 2 is slanted, which is vertical, and the e and a both lay on vertical lines. along with the other's, but e and a are the 2 main points you want to focus on. and c is kind of like your starting point, because c is for both angles, not just one.  

i hope that was and understanding.