Answers: 1
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04, Uc34758
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:30, fooligan3448
The local farm is advertising a special on fresh picked peaches. the farm charges $4.25 to pick your own peck of peaches and $3.50 for each additional peck you pick. write an equation for the total cost of peaches in terms of the number of pecks. deine your variables. how much does it cost to pick 3 pecks of peaches?
Answers: 3
Leg = 1 leg = 1 hypotenuse = c...
Mathematics, 09.10.2020 07:01
Mathematics, 09.10.2020 07:01