A linear transformation of the form z = Γx was applied to the data, where Γ is a 2 × 2 matrix. The decision boundary associated with the BDR is now the hyperplane of normal w = (1/ √ 2, −1/ √ 2)T which passes through the origin.

Part a: The transformation matrix is the clockwise rotation matrix of π/4.

Part b: The hyperplane would move towards the mean of class 1.

Part c: The distance will remain in the Euclidean Space  due to the rotation transformation only.

Step-by-step explanation:

As the complete question is not available, the question is searched online and a reference question is obtained which has 3 parts as follows:

Part a:

The decision boundary  after transformation coincides with the line x1 = x2, the two class means must lie on a line that is normal to the decision boundary, i.e. on x1 = −x2. This implies that the transformation matrix Γ is a clockwise rotation transformation of π/4, given as

Part b:

If the prior probability of class 0 was increased after transformation, then the decision boundary of BDR would still have the same normal as before,  i.e.,, but move toward the mean of class 1.

Part c:

Noting that

This indicates that the distance is still the same and is in Euclidean space. This is due to the fact that rotation transformations does not affect the distances between the points.

x=30

step-by-step explanation:

b. 1.25 hr

step-by-step explanation:

if you have a constant speed of 60 mph, then you have a ratio between 60 mi. to 1 hr. dividing both sides by 60 we get the ratio

1 mi. to

then mult. both sides by 75 we get the ratio

75 mi. to

simplifying we get

75 mi. to

or 1.25 hr.