Mathematics
Mathematics, 11.02.2020 19:43, amortegaa805

The efficiency for a steel specimen immersed in a phosphating tank is the weight of the phosphate coating divided by the metal loss (both in mg/ft2). An article gave the accompanying data on tank temperature (x) and efficiency ratio (y). Temp. 170 172 173 174 174 175 176 177 Ratio 0.74 1.21 1.46 1.05 1.01 1.06 1.12 1.88 Temp. 180 180 180 180 180 181 181 182 Ratio 1.49 1.50 1.63 2.11 2.07 0.82 1.35 0.96 Temp. 182 182 182 184 184 185 186 188 Ratio 1.73 1.98 2.58 1.51 2.44 3.02 1.81 3.08
(A) Determine the equation of the estimated regression line. (Round all numerical values to five decimal places.) y = (B) Calculate a point estimate for true average efficiency ratio when tank temperature is 182. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
(C) Calculate the values of the residuals from the least squares line for the four observations for which temperature is 182. (Round your answers to four decimal places.) (182, 0.96) (182, 1.73) (182, 1.98) (182, 2.58) Why do they not all have the same sign? These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the case of the third pair of observations, the observed efficiency ratio was equal to the predicted value. In the cases of the other pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value. These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the cases of the first two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value. In the cases of the last two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value. These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the cases of the first two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were smaller than the predicted value. In the cases of the last two pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value. These residuals do not all have the same sign because in the case of the second pair of observations, the observed efficiency ratio was equal to the predicted value. In the cases of the other pairs of observations, the observed efficiency ratios were larger than the predicted value.
(D) What proportion of the observed variation in efficiency ratio can be attributed to the simple linear regression relationship between the two variables? (Round your answer to four decimal places.)

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 14:20, hipstersale4913
Zahra was given two data sets, one without an outlier and one with an outlier. data without an outlier: 15, 19, 22, 26, 29 data with an outlier: 15, 19, 22, 26, 29, 81
Answers: 3
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00, priscillaan
Solve 3x-18=2y and 5x-6y=14 by elimination or substitution . show all !
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:10, bleesedbeme
What is the total surface area of this square pyramid?
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:30, mostman077
Solve the following inequalities and show the solution on a number line. 3/4 (2x-7) ≤ 5
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
The efficiency for a steel specimen immersed in a phosphating tank is the weight of the phosphate co...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 17.09.2019 11:50