Eugene and wes are solving the inequality 132 − 4x ≤ 36. each begins by subtracting
132 from both sides to get −4x ≤ −96, and then each divides both sides by −4. eugene gets
x ≤ 24 and wes gets x ≥ 24, however. always happy to offer advice, alex now suggests to
eugene and wes that answers to inequalities can often be checked by substituting x = 0
into both the original inequality and the answer. what do you think of this advice? graph
each of these answers on a number line. how do the results of this question relate to the
flooding of the exeter river?