Suppose that there were a strong correlation between the variables gand h.
which of these is a true statement?
o
a. gmust not cause h.
b. gmust cause h.
o
c. h must cause g.
o d. gmay cause h.

G may cause H.

Step-by-step explanation:

Correlation between variables does not imply casuality, since there could be a third variable which is the cause of both ( for example, the color of hair and the blood pressure might be correlated because the variable Age of the person causes white hair and high blood pressure when the person is old ). Correlation just means that a variable on average increases when the other one does.  

G may cause H

Step-by-step explanation:

I just did the test right now and I got it correct :)

2 & 7

step-by-step explanation:

he climbs 300 ft/hr at a constant rate. the peak is at 1,500 ft.

when going up, he reaches 600 ft in 2 hours. remember, that he is going in a constant rate. divide 600 with 300:

600/300 = 2

assuming that he takes the same route back (meaning that it's a 1500 ft route back, you can solve.

note also that you are solving when he gets back to 600 ft after he reaches the peak.

first, find the amount of hours it takes to get up the peak. divide the total amount (1500), with the ft/her (300) to get the amount of hours (x):

1500/300 = x

x = 5

it takes jamie 5 hours to get up. now, he is returning down, and reaches 600 (his current destination). remember that he climbs at a constant 300 ft/hr. divide 600 with 300:

600/300 = x

x = 2

now add the two numbers together.

x = 5 + 2 = 7

jamie takes 7 hours to go up the mountain and reach his current position when descending.

(total amount/constant rate) = (time).

remember that it is a constant rate, so in total, when he gets back down the mountain, it will take the same amount of time as when he goes up. the total amount for the round trip is: 5 + 5 = 10.

~