Suppose that the distance an aircraft travels along a runway before takeoff is given by d=(5/3)t^2, where d is measured in meters from the starting point and it measured in seconds from the time the brakes are released. the aircraft will become airborne when its speed reaches 300km/h. how long will it take to become airborne, and what distance will it travel in that time?

It will take 90s for the aircraft to become airbone.

In that time, the aircraft will have traveled 13500m = 13.5km.

Step-by-step explanation:

The velocity function is the derivative of the distance function.

In this problem, we have the following distance function:

So the speed function is the following:

The aircraft will become airborne when its speed reaches 300km/h. How long will it take to become airborne?

This is going to happen when S(t) = 300. So:

It will take 90s for the aircraft to become airbone.

What distance will it travel in that time?

This is D(t) when t = 90. So:

In that time, the aircraft will have traveled 13500m = 13.5km.

given : the shape of his satellite can be modeled by   where x and y are modeled in inches.

now,the given equation   is a equation of parabola.

here, coefficient of x is positive, hence the parabola opens rightwards.

on comparing this equation with standard equation , we get

in standard equation, coordinates of focus=(0,m)

thus for given equation coordinates of focus=(0,1.5)

step-by-step explanation:

i think it's eleven too, don't woosh me here, but according to the "experts" it's 2.

the proof starts from the peano postulates, which define the natural

numbers n. n is the smallest set satisfying these postulates:

  p1.   1 is in n.

  p2.   if x is in n, then its "successor" x' is in n.

  p3.   there is no x such that x' = 1.

  p4.   if x isn't 1, then there is a y in n such that y' = x.

  p5.   if s is a subset of n, 1 is in s, and the implication

      (x in s => x' in s) holds, then s = n.

then you have to define addition recursively:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 1, then define a + b = a'

      (using p1 and p2). if b isn't 1, then let c' = b, with c in n

      (using p4), and define a + b = (a + c)'.

then you have to define 2:

  def:   2 = 1'

2 is in n by p1, p2, and the definition of 2.

theorem:   1 + 1 = 2

proof: use the first part of the definition of + with a = b = 1.

      then 1 + 1 = 1' = 2   q.e.d.

note: there is an alternate formulation of the peano postulates which

replaces 1 with 0 in p1, p3, p4, and p5. then you have to change the

definition of addition to this:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 0, then define a + b = a.

      if b isn't 0, then let c' = b, with c in n, and define

      a + b = (a + c)'.

you also have to define 1 = 0', and 2 = 1'. then the proof of the

theorem above is a little different:

proof: use the second part of the definition of + first:

      1 + 1 = (1 + 0)'

      now use the first part of the definition of + on the sum in

      parentheses:   1 + 1 = (1)' = 1' = 2   q.e.d.