A2011 poll by the pew research center found that 66% of young women ages 18 to 34 rated a high-paying career high on their list of life priorities. let's assume for this problem that 66% of the female students in your high school consider a high-paying career as a priority. you plan to take a sample of 75 female students. if you calculate the variance of the sampling

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Which statement best describes the polynomial

Why did the ice arena get so hot after the big game (this is math related google it to find the paper