Kenji has at most $30 to spend on lily bulbs and tulip bulbs at his local flower store. lily bulbs cost $4 each, and tulip bulbs cost $2 each. tax is included in the prices of the bulbs. kenji has at most $30 to spend on lily bulbs and tulip bulbs at his local flower store. lily bulbs cost $4 each, and tulip bulbs cost $2 each. tax is included in the prices of the bulbs. create a constraint that can be used to represent all possible numbers of lily bulbs, x, and tulip bulbs, y, kenji can buy.

Question:

Kenji has at most $30 to spend on lily bulbs and tulip bulbs at his local flower store. Lily bulbs cost $4 each, and tulip bulbs cost $2 each. Tax is included in the prices of the bulbs.

Create a constraint that can be used to represent all possible numbers of lily bulbs, x, and tulip bulbs, y, Kenji can buy

Solution:

Let "x" be the number of lily bulbs and "y" be the number of tulip bulbs Kenji bought.

Given that Lily bulbs cost $ 4 each

Then cost of "x" lily bulbs =

Thus cost of "x" lily bulbs is $ 4x

Given that tulip bulbs cost $2 each

Then cost of "y" lily bulbs =

Thus cost of "y" lily bulbs is $ 2y

So the total of "x" lily bulbs and "y" tulip bulbs is represented as: $ (4x + 2y)

Kenji has at most $30 to spend on lily bulbs and tulip bulbs at his local flower store, so

Here we have used less than or equal to symbol to denote atmost 30

Create a constraint that can be used to represent all possible numbers of lily bulbs, x, and tulip bulbs, y, Kenji can buy:

good bye

step-by-step explanation:

so firstly, we need to isolate the y variables to be able to solve these inequalities. firstly, add 0.5x on both sides of the first inequality and subtract 1.5x on both sides of the second inequality:

now since the slope is positive for the first inequality, this means that the line going upwards belongs to the first inequality, and the line going downwards belongs to the second inequality.

next, since y ≥ in the first inequality, this means that the shaded region will be above the first inequality's line, thus shading regions a and b.

next, since y ≤ in the second inequality, this means that the shaded region is going to be below this line, thus shading regions a and c.

since both lines shade region a, this means that region a is the solution.

step-by-step explanation:

mark brainliest!