The midpoint m of cd has coordinates (2, 5). point c has coordinates (4, 3). what are the coordinates of point d?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Antonio made a scale model of a building. the model's scale is 1 inch to 235 feet and its height is 3.5 inches. what is the exact height of the actual building? enter your answer in the box.

Which of the following are accepted without proof in a logical system? check all that apply.