What is the error in ted's proof?
a. he writes the measure of angles adp and bcp as 60° instead of 45°.
b. he uses the sas postulate instead of aas postulate to prove the triangles congruent.
c. he writes the measure of angles adp and bcp as 60° instead of 30°.
d. he uses the sas postulate instead of sss postulate to prove the triangles congruent.

guess at question:

a vertical line intersects the graph of g(x,y) = 0 at two points. what conclusion follows about the function f(x) implicitly defined by g(x,f(x)) = 0?

the domain of f(x) cannot include the x coordinate of any such vertical line.

informally, f(x) is not a function, and

g(x,y)=0 cannot be solved for y uniquely.

the relation r = {(x,y) such that g(x,y) = 0} is a function if

for all (a,b) ∊ r and (c,d) ∊ r, a=c implies b=d.

step-by-step explanation:

my guess would be b and d, but i didn’t actually get out the pen and paper. lol

inch

step-by-step explanation:

yard and mile are too big.

answer: $13,622.84

step-by-step explanation: check the picture for info and stats : )