At a small company, the heed of human resources wants to examine salary to prepare annual reviews. he selects 28 01 - stocking clerk to 99 prosident. he plots salary against job type and finds a strong linoarolationahip with a corrlston of 0.96. the regresion ourgut gs salary - 15827.9+ 1939.1 job type. interpret this model and describe what he can conlude from this analynis. employees at rendom with job types ranging from 1-click the icon to view the plot. choose the correct answer below o a. the model is useful because the job type can be determined from the salary the positive slope indicates that salary increased from job type 01 to job type o b. the model is useful because salary can be determined from the job type. the positive slope indicates that salary increased from job type 01 to job type o c. the model is meaningless because the variable job type is not quantitative. the slope makes no sense because job type has no units. he should use a bar ○ d the model is meaningless boause the variable job type is not quantitative. the slope makes no sense becau骑sales has no units. the scatterplot used is 99. 99. chart of average salary for the different job types. fine, but the regression output is meaningless

the answer would be 1 1/72

step-by-step explanation:

you can rewrite the equation by separating the parts and then solving individually:

10-9=1

1/8 - 1/9=

find l c d and then combine:

1 1/72

you forgot the options, but i found them anyways, the correct answer is "john wilson believes that words and actions based on the intellect are superior to those based on emotions".

john wilson is depicted as an extremely intelligent man. the point of the excerpt is to make a sort of distinction between emotional and rational intelligence. he happens to have both attributes, but he clearly favors his intellectual gifts. at the same time, because of his religious background, he's a little bit conflicted with this and it makes him ashamed.

hope this !

no oblique asymptote

step-by-step explanation:

to find the oblique asymptote of f(x)

here numerator has degree 1 and denomintor degree 2

degree of numerator < degree of denominator

hence there is no oblique asymptote

when the degree of the denominator > that of the numerator, we saw that the value in the denominator got so much bigger, so quickly,   giving us a horizontal asymptote of the x-axis. or we can write

f(x) = a polynomial of x + a proper fraction.

in this case only we have oblique asymptotes but not when numerator has less degree.

0 and 5 minutes

step-by-step explanation:

given that one morning eight buses arrive late by the number of minutes given below:

0 8 2 6 9 2 0 7 8

write these in ascending order

0   0 2 6 7 8 8 9

in the afternoon two more buses arrive at the bus stop say by x and y minutes late.

total number of buses = 10

median = average of 4th and 5th after arranging in ascending order

since 4th entry is 6, the values of x and y should be below 6

also given 0 is the mode so either x or y or both should be 0 because then only 0 gets the maximum frequency and hence mode

thus we have

0 0 0 2 6 7 8 8 9 and another unknown entry which is below 6.

since median is 3.5, we have the unknown entry to be 5 only because then only median =( 2+5)/2

thus the after noon buses were late by 0 and 5 minutes.