Atest of breaking strengths of 6 ropes manufactured by a company showed a (sample) mean breaking strength of 7750 lbs and a (sample) standard deviation of 145 lbs, whereas the manufacturer claimed a true mean breaking strength of 8000 lbs. you think that the manufacturer is wrong and that the true mean is not 8000 lbs, but you are agnostic as to whether it is larger or smaller. can we support the manufacturer’s claim at a level of significance equal to 0.05? (be sure to write down your null and alternative hypothesis. if you do not, you will lose many points

answer: a.

step-by-step explanation: the answer is a. because, you need to converge the fractions to find a solution.

saving = more money

step-by-step explanation:

if you have 100 bucks, and you want to buy a candy bar, even if you have one at home, if you choose not to buy it, you save.

~courtney

it can be to see completed examples before writing, in order to examine what makes for an effective piece. see how these intros give some context before posing the topic and lead naturally into the body paragraphs, where the evidence will be listed. you can imagine how the author has organized the rest of the piece.

"we buried my cousin last summer. he was 32 when he hanged himself from a closet coat rack in the throes of alcoholism, the fourth of my blood relatives to die prematurely from this deadly disease. if america issued drinking licenses, those four men—including my father, who died at 54 of liver failure—might be alive today. that is a good example piece   some steps that are .

. writing something that happened to you

.read a book you like to get ideas from there

. lastly you can make a venn diagram

hope this plz make brainliest

step-by-step explanation: