Fifty hundredths seventy-five hundredths twenty hundredths eighty hundredths
1.2
20%
0.50\
80%
0.75
0.8
put in the right places

John can eat 10 cookies in 1/2 hr how many cookies can he eat in 45 minutes make a proportion and solve

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Which of the following is the explicit rule for a geometric sequence defined a recursive formula of a -5a for which the first term is 23?