∫c((x2+5y)i⃗ +3y3j⃗ )⋅dr⃗ ∫ c ( ( x 2 + 5 y ) i → + 3 y 3 j → ) ⋅ d r → where c c consists of the three line segments from (3,0,0) ( 3 , 0 , 0 ) to (3,2,0) ( 3 , 2 , 0 ) to (0,2,0) ( 0 , 2 , 0 ) to (0,2,4) ( 0 , 2 , 4 ) .

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.