The relationship between a distance in yards (y) and the same distance in miles (m) is described by the equation y=1760m. is there a proportional relationship between a measurement in yards and a measurement in miles for the same distance? explain why or why not

y ∝ m and 1760 is a constant of proportionality.

Step-by-step explanation:

The relation between a distance in the yards (y) and the same distance in miles (m) is described by the equation y = 1760m.

So, the graph of the above equation passes through the origin(0,0) and it will be a straight line with a constant slope of 1760.

Therefore, a measurement in yards and a measurement in miles are in the relation of proportionality for the same distance.

Hence, y ∝ m and 1760 is a constant of proportionality. (Answer)

Yes. There exist a direct proportionality, since a change in one variable leads to a direct change in the other variable and exist a constant ratio between them.

Step-by-step explanation:

The condition of direct proportionality mean the existence of the following relationship:

Where k is a constant of proportionality, the suggested formula observes every characteristic of the direct proportionality. (k = 1760)

do you have a picture of the table

you ignore the remainder, therefore the answer is y = x+2

step-by-step explanation:

you have to divide the denominator by the numerator. you can use synthetic division or long division.

[-5] .     1 .     7 .     11

x + 2 + 1/x+5