Bootstrap support values for the nj analyses are depicted where 1 = 100%, 0.95 = 95%, etc., whereas bootstrap support values based on parsimony analysis are depicted as percentages. with that in mind (i. e., ‘1’ for nj is the same as ‘100’ for parsimony based), are bootstrap support values identical for the two analyses? if not, why do you think they are different? (hint: if you’re stuck, one exercise you might try is to conduct the same nj analysis multiple times using the same settings, and pay attention to the resulting bootstrap support values. you also could run the same parsimony-based analysis multiple times for comparison).

$4034.40

the perimeter of the field is the sum of the lengths of the four sides:

47 yd + 158 yd + 47 yd + 158 yd = 410 yd

the cost of 3 ft (1 yd) of fence is 3×$3.28 = $9.84.

so the cost of jake's wood perimeter fance is

(410 yd) × ($9.84 /yd) = $4034.40

proofs involving isosceles triangles often require special consideration because an isosceles triangle has several distinct properties that do not apply to normal triangles.(more about triangle types) therefore, when you are trying to prove that two triangles are congruent, and one or both triangles, are isosceles you have a few theorems that you can use to make your life easier.

step-by-step explanation:

an isosceles triangle has two congruent sides and two congruent angles. the congruent angles are called the base angles and the other angle is known as the vertex angle. ∠bac and ∠bca are the base angles of the triangle picture on the left. the vertex angle is ∠abc

answer: idk wbu

step-by-step explanation: umm..