The perimeter of the original rectangle on the left is 30 meters. the perimeter of the reduced rectangle on the right is 24 meters.

Could someone with number 1 and 2

Manuela claims that and are congruent. which statement best describes her claim? she is incorrect because the segments do not have the same orientation. she is incorrect because the segments do not have the same length. she is correct because the segments have the same length. she is correct because the segments have the same orientation.

Could someone me with this question i’ve been stuck on it for 20 minutes