Suppose that the last three scenarios of vectoraddition in this experiment were instead actually vector subtractions, in theform of (~f1−~f2), instead vector additions. using computer software (such asmicrosoft word) create three separate vector subtraction diagrams, one foreach of the last three scenarios in this experiment. you may use either of thetwo graphical method introduced in the theory section. would these threenew resultant vectors have the same angle of orientation as was measured (orcalculated) during the experiment? could the magnitude of a resultant vectorpossibly be different for vector subtraction than for vector addition? if not, explain. if so, give an example. identify the independent variable(s) in thisexperiment. identify the dependent variable(s) in this experiment.

answer: 590

step-by-step explanation:

(0,-3) see attached graph

step-by-step explanation:

a. to solve the system, graph the two equations.

x = y+3 becomes y=x-3 has m=1/1 and b=-3. start at (0,-3) on the y-axis and plot a point. then move up 1 unit and 1 unit to the right. plot a point and connect.

y=-4x+3 has m =-4/1 and b=-3. start at (0,-3) on the y-axis and plot a point. then move down four units and to the right 1 unit. plot a point and connect.

the solution is the point (x,y) where the two lines intersect. by the graph below it is (0,-3).

b. to solve by substitution, substitute y = -4x-3 into x= y+3

x= (-4x-3) +3

x=-4x

5x=0

x=0

now substitute x = 0 back in to find y.

y= -4(0)-3

y=0-3

y=-3

solution is (0,-3)

c. use elimination by adding the equations together.

x-y=3

4x+y=-3

5x=0

x=0

then substitute into one equation to find y.

y=-4(0)-3

y=-3

false

step-by-step explanation:

rulers and compasses arent required in order to bisect an angle because when bisecting angles, you're making a "half circle" and considering in order to bisect an angle it wouldn't be straight, you wouldn't need either of the two

id

step-by-step explanation:

idk

idk

i know the way

and

idk