Mathematics
Mathematics, 06.10.2019 08:30, jadetaull19

Iwill awardgiven: δdek, de = ek ef - ∠bisector of ∠e m∠def = 44°, m∠dek =


Iwill awardgiven: δdek, de = ek ef - ∠bisector of ∠e m∠def = 44°, m∠dek =

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04, Uc34758
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:00, Talber1
Planning for the possibility that your home might get struck by lighting and catch on fire is part of a plan
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:00, faithcalhoun
Acylinder has volume 45π and radius 3. what is it’s height?
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:20, garciavergaraana
Which of these equations, when solved, gives a different value of x than the other three? a9.1 = -0.2x + 10 b10 = 9.1 + 0.2x c10 – 0.2x = 9.1 d9.1 – 10 = 0.2x
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Iwill awardgiven: δdek, de = ek ef - ∠bisector of ∠e m∠def = 44°, m∠dek =
...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 17.06.2020 04:57
Konu
Mathematics, 17.06.2020 04:57