Freddy mixed 1 6/16 gallons of white paint with 2 1/8 gallon of paint to paint the walls of a home office. how much pay does freddy have in all?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

1c) the number 131 is a term in the sequence defined by the explicit rule f(n)=5n-4. which term in the sequence is 131? 2a) write the first four terms of the function f(n)=n^2-1 2b) what is the 10th term of the sequence defined by the explicit rule f(n)=n^2-1 2c) the number 224 is a term in the sequence defined by the explicit rule f(n)=n^2-1. which term in the sequence is 224?

What is the measure of angle x? answer