How much more pizza did scott eat than

3

Step-by-step explanation:

9/16 - 3/4

First make these fractions have the same denominator which in this case will be 16 so the equation will be 9/16- 12/16 and 12-9= 3 so therefore Scott ate 3 more pizzas than Owen

Scott ate 3/16 more pizza than Owen.

Step-by-step explanation: Both fractions must have the same denominator. Multiply the numerator and denominator of 3/4 by 4 and you get 12/16.

12/16 is 3/16 more than 9/16.

So Scott ate 3/16 more pizza than Owen.

∠1≅∠2 by the alternate exterior angles theorem.

step-by-step explanation:

given, a ∥ b and ∠1 ≅ ∠3 .we have to prove that e ∥ f

we know that ∠1≅∠3 and that a || b because they are given. we see that by the alternate exterior angles theorem. therefore, ∠2≅∠3 by the transitive property. so, we can conclude that e || f by the converse alternate exterior angles theorem.

we have to fill the missing statement.

transitivity property states that if a = b and b = c, then a = c.

now, given ∠1≅∠3 and by transitivity property ∠2≅∠3 .

hence, to apply transitivity property one angle must be common which is not in result after applying this property which is ∠1.

the only options in which ∠1 is present are ∠1 and ∠2, ∠1 and ∠4

∠1 and ∠4 is not possible ∵ after applying transitivity we didn't get ∠4.

hence, the missing statement is ∠1≅∠2.

so, ∠1≅∠2 by the alternate exterior angles theorem.

answer: c. is your answer

step-by-step explanation: get me a black leather coat