Byron is conducting an experiment to determine whether a new medication is effective in reducing coughing. he finds 1,200 volunteers with coughing issues and divides them into two groups. the control group does not receive any medication; the treatment group receives the medication. the patients in the treatment group show reduced signs of coughing. what can byron conclude from this experiment?

Byron is conducting an experiment to determine whether a new medication is effective in reducing coughing.

Byron finds 1200 volunteers with coughing issues and divides them into two groups.

The control group does not receive any medication; the treatment group receives the medication. The patients in the treatment group show reduced signs of coughing.

Therefore, Byron can conclude that the new medication is effective in reducing coughing.

Byron can say that the medicine given to people most likely worked as the treatment group showed signs of reduced coughing.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that Byron is conducting an experiment to determine whether a new medication is effective in reducing coughing.  Byron finds 1200 volunteers with coughing issues and divides them into two groups.

The control group does not receive any medication; the treatment group receives the medication. The patients in the treatment group show reduced signs of coughing.

This implies that medication has a positive effect of reducing coughing.

u rich

step-by-step explanation:

x ≥ 18 is your answer

step-by-step explanation:

let "a number" = x

(2/3)x + 17 ≥ 29

isolate the variable (x). do the opposite of pemdas (parenthesis, exponent (& root), multiplication, division, addition, subtraction).

first, subtract 17 from both sides.

(2/3)x + 17 (-17) ≥ 29 (-17)

(2/3)x ≥ 29 - 17

(2/3)x ≥ 12

next, multiply 3/2 to both sides to isolate the x

(3/2)(2/3)x ≥ 12(3/2)

x ≥ 12(3/2)

simplify. multiply, then divide

x ≥ (12 * 3)/2

x ≥ (36)/2

x ≥ 18

x ≥ 18 is your answer

~