Mathematics, 13.07.2019 17:10, Trackg8101
Let a, b e r. we learned that if f is continuous on (a, b) then f is integrable on [a, b]. we did not look at the proof of this, which is quite involved, in class. you will prove a weaker version of this theorem in this question. first we need a definition: definition: let c > 0. given f : [a, b] → r. we say f is c-pink iff "x € [a, b], vy € [a, b], \f (x) – f(y) 0. fix a c-pink function f : [a, b] → r. prove that f is integrable on (a, b). hint: let n e n. let pn be the partition dividing [a, b] into n equal sub-intervals. using the fact that f is c-pink, what simple expression can you conclude u(f, pn) - l(f, pn) is less than? conclude with the e-reformulation of integrability.
Answers: 3
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 01:30, b2cutie456
Drag the titles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs. the probability that kevin has diabetes and the test
Answers: 3
Let a, b e r. we learned that if f is continuous on (a, b) then f is integrable on [a, b]. we did no...
History, 09.12.2021 01:00
English, 09.12.2021 01:00
History, 09.12.2021 01:00
Health, 09.12.2021 01:00
Computers and Technology, 09.12.2021 01:00
Geography, 09.12.2021 01:00