Mathematics
Mathematics, 13.07.2019 17:10, Trackg8101

Let a, b e r. we learned that if f is continuous on (a, b) then f is integrable on [a, b]. we did not look at the proof of this, which is quite involved, in class. you will prove a weaker version of this theorem in this question. first we need a definition: definition: let c > 0. given f : [a, b] → r. we say f is c-pink iff "x € [a, b], vy € [a, b], \f (x) – f(y) 0. fix a c-pink function f : [a, b] → r. prove that f is integrable on (a, b). hint: let n e n. let pn be the partition dividing [a, b] into n equal sub-intervals. using the fact that f is c-pink, what simple expression can you conclude u(f, pn) - l(f, pn) is less than? conclude with the e-reformulation of integrability.

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:00, eksdeeexe
Acar travels at an average speed of 52 miles per hour. how long does it take to travel 299 miles
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:00, puppy4151
What is the value of x in the equation (2)3) (x+6)= -18 a. -36 b. -33 c. -24 d. -18
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 01:30, lalanduni
Ebert used to make $22 an hour, but got a 10% raise. how much more will he make in a 40 hour work week with raise?
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 01:30, b2cutie456
Drag the titles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs. the probability that kevin has diabetes and the test
Answers: 3
Do you know the correct answer?
Let a, b e r. we learned that if f is continuous on (a, b) then f is integrable on [a, b]. we did no...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Health, 09.12.2021 01:00