Mathematics
Mathematics, 23.06.2019 20:50, david6835

What are the missing parts that correctly complete the proof? drag the answers into the boxes to correctly complete the proof. statement reason km − → − is the bisector of ∠jkl . given ∠kxm and ∠kym are right angles. given ∠kxm≅∠kym all right angles are congruent. reflexive property of congruence △kxm≅△kym mx ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ≅ my ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ point m is equidistant from the sides of ∠jkl . definition of equidistant definition of bisectordefinition of perpendiculartransitive property of congruencecorresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent. aas congruence theorem sas congruence postulate ∠jkm≅∠lkm mk ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ≅ mk ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ kx ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ≅ ky ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯

answer
Answers: 2

Similar questions

Do you know the correct answer?
What are the missing parts that correctly complete the proof? drag the answers into the boxes to co...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Health, 06.03.2021 23:10